FPS Sci-fi game W.I.P(unnamed): Page 3

FPS Sci-fi game W.I.P(unnamed)

Schuster

@wombatstampede said: I moved directly from 2.x to 3.1 because of the GLES2 support. And that is also because GLES3 of 3.0.6 was much slower on older hardware. But going back from GLES3 to GLES2 is not always simple.. I.e. the Particles have to be replaced by CPUParticles.

Yes, that's right.... I'm working on one project now, and I'm using gles2 mode it's quite great but they are still some bugs yet...I'm no longer use 3.0.6.

Ace_Dragon

@Schuster said: Thanks @"Ace Dragon" I tried 3.1alpha4 /alpha5 and Calinou's build but for me it's the same.....no increase fps....bridge scene has 27-28(window mode) fps in the editor play mode and run without editor 29 - 35 fps (window mode)....and that's just one enemy in the level - hovering bot.....the truth is that I do not have a very powerful machine......only the integrated graphics hd2500 + i3cpu and 4GB mem........maybe that's it

If you're on Intel integrated graphics, then there's a few features (on GLES3) like GI Probes you will simply not be able to run well.

If you're using GI Probes, you may have to remove them or give the player an option to disable them if you are targeting Intel Integrated users. They are also harder to target in general because the driver quality has a reputation for being horrible.

You will probably have to use the GLES2 renderer. The graphics won't look quite as advanced, but neither is a machine without a discrete GPU.

Schuster

If you're using GI Probes, you may have to remove them...>

I don't use GI probes, I would not have a chance...it's clear.... I need a better GPU and more memory :) I tried gles 2 mode but I get just 41 fps max.....Godot needs Occlusion Culling and fast LOD.

wombatstampede

Just to stress this: Godot 3.x does not have LOD, yet. As far as I get from github, they want to postpone it to 3.2.

At least they`ve put some LOD parameter fields in the MeshInstances so you can query them if you add your own - preliminary - LOD. Which is on the other hand perhaps not a bad idea because then you can parametrize the LOD levels depending on user/hardware defined values.

Schuster

Yes,...perhaps soon the LOD system will be implemented....it is important to have a good lod available for larger projects.

Calinou

@Schuster said: Yes,...perhaps soon the LOD system will be implemented....it is important to have a good lod available for larger projects.

You may be interested in https://github.com/leiget/LOD-Simple-Example :)

Schuster

Great.....Thanks for the link.

wombatstampede

Thank you, Calinou! :)

« Previous Page