rigidbody doesn't not detect collsion while in kinematic mode ...: Page 2

rigidbody doesn't not detect collsion while in kinematic mode ...

fire7side

@epicspaces said: fire7side wtf is wrong with you, I'm using rigidbodies, I have to make moveandslide() from scratch, doesn't exist on rigidbodies in kinematic.mode, but thanks for your useless effort

I thought you switched to a kinematic body when you said you used move and slide, which personally, I would do. There is nothing stopping you from doing it other than a rewrite. Sorry I can't read your mind. If you say you used move and slide than logic would say you had switched to kinematic body. Have you tried using an area? I'm not sure if one can be attached to a moving body or not. The code you posted basically uses translation which doesn't work well with physics. I saw one example where someone used "move()" on a rigidbody but I can't find it. He was getting collisions. I found that example with move, but it was for a kinematic body.

TwistedTwigleg

@epicspaces said: yeah babe

This is an inappropriate response, especially after being warned. Failure to follow the forum rules will lead to a ban. Consider yourself warned.

@epicspaces said: still didnt get my answer

It is entirely possible no one knows the answer for your particular situation, etc. Bumping a thread with “I didn’t get my answer” is rather rude. You are not entitled to an answer.

To answer the question of moving platforms:

In the case of moving platforms with Rigidbody nodes, it is complicated. The last time I looked at it I had Rigidbody nodes resting on moving platforms “inherit” velocity from the moving platform by raycasting downwards, checking if it hit a moving platform, and then reading the velocity (from the platform script) and applied it to the Rigidbody. It was not perfect though, Rigidbody nodes tended to slide or fly off when it suddenly starts/stops moving.

You will likely need to find your own solution for your particular use case.

Audiobellum

Wow, this thread was interesting. So after behaving inappropriately, you've managed to get all this feedback. Even though it seems implausible that you were merely unaware of what the rules are, you've managed to get a second warning after the first warming wasn't good enough. Even though I wouldn't call people fools around here, especially when I'm the one asking for help, I do at least get where you're coming from emotionally and did find this thread morbidly entertaining. Personally, I won't assume anyone is being a fool for ignoring me when I ask for help; this forum is probably filled with people who are more experienced when it comes to programming and using Godot than I'll ever be. At the same time, that is why I also have a hard time believing that they're people where we don't know how to help me at all. Instead, what I just assume that I'm being ignored for being an annoying noob who need to earn respect by going through some sort of painful rite of passage amongst game developers. There is also the other possibility that being an experienced game developer doesn't necessarily mean that one is good at teaching, or that I'm just boring. If or when I do finally master Godot, I do promise to share all or most of my secrets as I don't believe being a game dev should be this hard. They're other things I could be doing with my time like hanging out with people who really wanted to get to know me. However, my dedication to learning how to mastering Godot have given some of the people around me the impression that I don't care about them or want to even be around them. I care about them more than they'll ever know but, my mental illness demands that I be more discipline more than everyone else as I'm easily distracted. They're people who I know personally who think that I'm the most organized person they've ever known but, they really don't know the half of it.

epicspaces

Im writing a cusom character controller, The Unity Physics.ComputePenetration equivalent in Godot ? hm smart Guys ?

epicspaces

I have a bad feeling about this silence again ? don't tell me that godot doesn't have a ComputePenetration because body_get_kinematic_safe_margin use a kinematic body, I don't want it to be kinematic body?

TwistedTwigleg

I’d wait longer than roughly a half hour before presuming there is “silence”.

The cast_motion function is likely the Godot equivalent: https://docs.godotengine.org/en/stable/classes/class_physicsdirectspacestate.html#class-physicsdirectspacestate

cybereality

To be honest, I could probably figure it out in 20 minutes, but I'm not donating my time to someone who is rude and insulting people. Not worth my time.

epicspaces

Hi TwistedTwigleg, I'd like to get the value of the penetration of sphere shape maybe body_get_kinematic_safe_margin will do it, any implementation ? I dont need to cast motion, too much unstable

epicspaces

https://github.com/godotengine/godot-proposals/issues/1370 sound that it's not added yet, shoud I post a request like this guy? will it be added in 2025 or 2030 or maybe 2100 ? cybereality you don't have to insult or abuse me !it's okay !

epicspaces

what's the point of a physics engine if it can't serve us a simple penetration death :/

fire7side

It's open source. Have at it.

TwistedTwigleg

I think this thread should be closed now.

@epicspaces said: I'd like to get the value of the penetration of sphere …

I think you can use collide shape and cast shape in the physics server link I sent. That said, it might not be supported like Unity out of the box, in which case I’d recommend opening a feature request/proposal.

Megalomaniak

@Audiobellum said: Instead, what I just assume that I'm being ignored for being an annoying noob who need to earn respect by going through some sort of painful rite of passage amongst game developers.

I doubt it's ever that, rather the issue might be the way the question was presented, users that might have a vague idea of an answer might simply not even realize it since the way the question was presented they might have either misidentified the issue and/or are unsure how to answer. Sometimes it's worth rephrasing your question(but still do so respectfully and sincerely), even if there are no posts from others, we usually wouldn't consider that bumping your topic.

« Previous Page